Correspondence relating to various ambassador meetings hosted by the First Minister.
8 March 2022
Thank you for your request which I received on 8 February 2022. You asked for:
Any minutes or correspondence related to the following meetings held by the First Minister:
13/10/21: EU Ambassador to the UK Meeting
18/11/21: German ambassador
22/11/21: French ambassador
30/11/21: Jane Dodds MS
7/12/21, 14/12/21, 16/12/21, 21/12/21: Adam Price
I can confirm that no information is held in relation to the Jane Dodds MS and Adam Price MS parts of your request.
Other information requested is exempt under Section 21 (Information accessible to applicant by other means) and/or Section 27 (International Relations) of the Freedom of Information Act 2000.
Section 27 is a qualified exemption and a Public Interest Test has therefore been applied. Reasons for withholding the information are detailed at Annex 1.
- EU Ambassador - a post was made on social media which outlines the high level content of the meeting therefore this is exempt under s21 (Information accessible to applicant by other means).
- German Ambassador - a post was made on social media which outlines the high level content of the meeting therefore this is exempt under s21 (Information accessible to applicant by other means).
- French Ambassador – any information discussed is exempt under s27 (International Relations).
- Jane Dodds MS and Adam Price MS – there is no information held.
If you are dissatisfied with the Welsh Government’s handling of your request, you can ask for an internal review within 40 working days of the date of this response. Requests for an internal review should be addressed to the Welsh Government’s Freedom of Information Officer at:
Information Rights Unit
or e-mail: Freedom.email@example.com
Please remember to quote the ATISN reference number above.
You also have the right to complain to the Information Commissioner. The Information Commissioner can be contacted at:
Information Commissioner’s Office
Telephone: 0303 123 1113
However, please note that the Commissioner will not normally investigate a complaint until it has been through our own internal review process.
Section 21 – Information accessible to applicant by other means
The exemption states:
(1) Information which is reasonably accessible to the applicant otherwise than under section 1 is exempt information.
(2) For the purposes of subsection (1) —
(a) information may be reasonably accessible to the applicant even though it is accessible only on payment, and
(b) information is to be taken to be reasonably accessible to the applicant if it is information which the public authority or any other person is obliged by or under any enactment to communicate (otherwise than by making the information available for inspection) to members of the public on request, whether free of charge or on payment.
(3) For the purposes of subsection (1), information which is held by a public authority and does not fall within subsection (2)(b) is not to be regarded as reasonably accessible to the applicant merely because the information is available from the public authority itself on request, unless the information is made available in accordance with the authority’s publication scheme and any payment required is specified in, or determined in accordance with, the scheme.
Section 27 (International Relations)
The exemption states:
Section 27(1) Information is exempt if its disclosure would, or would be likely to, harm UK interests which are set out in the exemption.
Sections 27(2) and (3) provide an exemption for information obtained in confidence from another state, international organisation or international court.
Section 27(4) provides an exemption from the duty to confirm or deny whether information is held if doing so would or would be likely to prejudice the interests protected by section 27(1) or would involve the disclosure of confidential information protected by section 27(2).
Public interest arguments in favour of release
The Welsh Government acknowledges the general public interest in openness and transparency that release would engender. Further, we recognise that there is public interest in understanding the process by which the Welsh Government and the UK Government discuss certain policy matters and that the release of the information could lead to greater transparency and openness in the way the Welsh Government conducts business with other administrations, which can improve accountability and public trust.
Public interest arguments in favour of withholding
We have considered the information held and believe that its release would be prejudicial to Welsh Government’s future ability to have frank and open discussions with UK Government and international stakeholders and would affect Welsh Government’s ability to gather information to conduct effective policy making across a wide number of areas with countries where we have common interests. Following the UK’s withdrawal from the EU, it is important that we maintain a relationship with individual European governments and countries, in the same way as we do with other countries such as the USA or Japan. The release of this information will inhibit the openness of discussions.
Disclosure of the information which was generated within this climate of trust and expectation of confidence would be likely to result in the same trust and confidence being eroded and a reluctance to share information which would be likely to prejudice relations between both parties on both this and other matters, particularly on this issue where the withheld information involves a subject matter which may still pertain to current and or future considerations by the Welsh Government and the UK Government. Such prejudice would not be in the public interest.
I believe therefore that the balance of the public interest falls in favour of withholding the withheld information for the reasons outlined above.