Local transport fund, resilient roads fund and ultra low emission vehicle transformation fund: grant assessment criteria 2023 to 2024
Explains the criteria and weighting used to award funding for local transport fund, resilient roads fund and ultra low emission vehicle transformation fund.
This file may not be fully accessible.
|
Criteria
|
Weighting (W) |
|
Strategic fit: does the scheme demonstrate a sound case for change? Does it fit with the grant purpose/ objectives? |
10 |
|
Well-being: does the scheme align with and support the WTS Llwybr Newydd ambitions? Does it maximise contribution to well-being? Does it offer value for money? |
5 |
|
Management: is the scheme deliverable and have any milestones been explained? Have the delivery risks been identified and mitigated? |
5 |
|
Affordability: what is the total scheme cost to LTF/ RRF? Scoring: <£0.2m = 5, £0.2m-£0.49m = 4, £0.5m-£0.99m = 3, £1 m-£4.99m = 2, £5m-£9.99m = 1, £10m and over = 0 |
4 |
|
Match funding: is match funding available? Scoring: 0% = 0, 1%-9% = 1; 10%-19% = 2; 20%-29% = 3; 30%-39% = 4 etc |
4 |
|
Deliverability: how will the scheme be procured? Is it viable? Does the contract length fit with the grant terms and conditions? |
3 |
|
Monitoring, evaluation and promotion: does the proposal include plan for monitoring, evaluation and promotion? |
3 |
Notes
a) Scoring
5 = Outstanding
4 = Very Good
3 = Good
2 = Adequate
1 = Poor
0 = None or No Evidence
b) Calculation
The weighting is multiplied by the scoring for the assessment values, which are all added together to give the final value.